Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bailey Jay
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 00:56, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Bailey Jay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable adult film actress. Appears to fail WP:GNG (lack of multiple independent reliable sources providing significant coverage) and WP:PORNSTAR. The 4chan-related "notability" only counts as notability if it's based again on reliable sources, of which I have been able to find none. A previous claim of a nomination for an AVN award was deleted when the source for it didn't list the actress under any of her names. Most of the proffered citations are from a single fansite or primary sources, the exceptions are two program listings for Playboy Radio, and a single mention of her name with no other information in a list of people performing at an event. Also a declined PROD from a previous editor. j⚛e deckertalk 08:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 16:01, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree. Delete as non-notable on above grounds. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom The Eskimo (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources (WP:GNG), I cannot find such coverage, therefore there does not seem enough verifiable information to maintain an article; also concerns about biography of living people issues Chzz ► 15:38, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.