Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babylon Fields

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of 22:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon Fields (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable "proposed" television series. Two pilots were shot, but the series was ultimately not picked up. All references are reworded press releases, not independent of the subject, reporting verbatim casting news and attached crew. Thousands of unaired pilots exist and do not merit standalone articles- this particular one lacks significant coverage needed to establish long-term notability. -- Wikipedical (talk) 18:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:54, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There was no chance CBS was ever going to pick this series up; it wasn't picked up by NBC either. This should have been deleted on sight in October 2007, but we hadn't established a hard 'it goes to series and gets scheduled or it doesn't get an article here' guideline yet, as it has no cult notability which could have saved it as a pilot with some interest. Nate (chatter) 04:50, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:HAMMER. I almost went for a keep !vote because of this line: "Babylon Fields was resurrected by NBC." Kudos to Quick and Dirty User Account, who wrote that. Bearian (talk) 01:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.