Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B is for Build

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

B is for Build

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable, in-depth, independent treatment of this YouTube channel. On the face of it, insufficiently notable. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 03:19, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:51, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (copied from editor talk page --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)) I'm still trying to get my head around Wikipedia, I hope I'm doing this right. I'll see if I can make the article more relevant to a wider audience. I put it up as the channel is quite well known in the car community and similar to pages like this: Mighty Car Mods. Thanks for your help. Thijsvr (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Thijsv: What is lacking here is a sufficient number of independent, in-depth, reliable sources that discuss the subject. News or magazine articles (presumably online), or articles on reputable blogs, are what can be used to show that the channel has received a crucial amount of outside attention; which is what we require to determine its notability, in the Wikipedia sense. See WP:GNG for the lowdown on that. I'm not seeing such sources in the article, and I was unable to find them in a search either. - Mighty Car Mods, in my opinion, is not the best role model; that's pretty skimpy sourcing as well, but at least there are some unconnected outlets that have written about it (even if it's little more than blurbs...) --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nom, the subject does not meet WP:GNG. Jmertel23 (talk) 22:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.