Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BLAG Linux and GNU (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 22:34, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

BLAG Linux and GNU

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Discontinued Linux distribution with no updates for nearly a decade CallLetters (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CallLetters (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CallLetters (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CallLetters (talk) 22:41, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Wikipedia actually does keep articles about subjects that are of historical importance, not just ongoing events. This subject meets WP:GNG and thus qualifies to be retained. - Ahunt (talk) 22:51, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ Keep despite inadequate nominator's rationale, per 1st nomination, ~~this is not a notable distribution.~~ On second look at article sources, seems to meet GNG. Elizium23 (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - contains multiple independent, reliable and sign sources hence meeting WP:GNG. Eyebeller 23:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - being discontinued is irrelevant for meeting WP:GNG. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 09:52, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Barely meets GNG. The Brixton Linux Action Group sound quite a bit more interesting than their distribution, so I could see myself supporting a content move. — Charles Stewart (talk) 14:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets GNG plus when sources are evaluated again NSOFTWARE (essay) Wikipedia:Notability (software)#Reliability and significance of sources they demonstrate N. // Timothy :: talk 12:23, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.