Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BATCH AI
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 02:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- BATCH AI (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG Winner 42 Talk to me! 22:07, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - fails GNG, can't find anything except youtube video about it —МандичкаYO 😜 23:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - The article has few details to help search but I searched anyway and found nothing. SwisterTwister talk 03:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete No credible claim of significance. If everyone was allowed to put any random software application they wrote on Wikipedia, we'd be fucked. ― Padenton|✉ 01:13, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 17:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep for 5 more days no evidence of notability. No references to help establish notability. Recommend deleting in 5 days if no improvement. I'm not dead but I am fat (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as non notable software - Bit pointless recommending deletion in 5 days when it's better off being deleted now!. –Davey2010Talk 02:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.