Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avendesora Password Utility

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:32, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Avendesora Password Utility

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not establish product notability. Primarily promotional in tone. Google search does not find third-party coverage, only its own coverage. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Article was deleted yesterday (CSD). COI account. Article does not show notability and is promotional, written by a COI account. We should not even be here as it is a clear-cut case. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom and Alexf.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:56, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 11:31, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: In my view, the article creator has avoided promotional tone. It is however purely a nuts-and-bolts description of the utility with neither a claim to nor evidence of attained notability. Nor are my searches finding better. AllyD (talk) 08:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.