Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoworld.com.my

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoworld.com.my

Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 11:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the company has generated sufficient third party coverage to warrant inclusion, as evidenced by the numerous sources already used in the article. (Additional sources are also available). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable web site; violates WP:N and WP:SPAM --mhking (talk) 17:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is established through the article's sources. An advertising-like tone can be solved through editing. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Seems to be enough notabilit yto warrant inclusion. ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per the sources available. Tavix | Talk 17:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. Colonel Warden (talk) 21:31, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.