Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authors Tree Publishing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Authors Tree Publishing

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Badly fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG; zero coverage outside of its own promotional/sponsored articles and self-published sources. Also see List of self-publishing companies, where the article creator continually tries to promote this company. At best, this is WP:TOOSOON, way too soon. Spiderone 22:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Sources do not not meet WP:NCORP criteria and nothing additional found with a Google Search. S0091 (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. CapitalSasha ~ talk 00:18, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This page should not have been created in the first place, it should have been SD while still a draft. But since it wasn't delete. VViking_TalkEdits 14:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:NORG RationalPuff (talk) 15:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A listing-type article on a recent new firm. No evidence of notability provided or found in searches. AllyD (talk) 08:39, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails general notability guidelines. Luciapop (talk) 11:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.