Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audiofy bookchip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Audiofy bookchip

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One news article does not justify an article. Possibly merge to Pimsleur Language Programs - there may be other mentions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and Technology. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources found that actually mention the bookchip other than mirrors and the already-cited NYT article. As for merging, I can't say if that would be the best thing to do or not because I don't have a NYT subscription and can't see how much coverage is given to Pimsleur and the bookchip. @PARAKANYAA: do you have access to that NYT article? ‍Relativity ⚡️ 01:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Relativity You can cheat your way out of the NYT barrier for most articles. In any case it's about three paragraphs on audiofy. Reading it again though I don't think the company behind audiofy has anything to do with Pimsleur and they just happened to serve their product. So maybe just delete. PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: when I wrote this article in 2008, it had a "technical details" section, which I hoped other editors would improve, but instead it just got removed as "original research" a decade later. I don't see much value in the rest of the article without it. Silas S. Brown (email, talk) 06:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.