Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attributes of some free software licenses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:22, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Attributes of some free software licenses

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This table seems WP:INDISCRIMINATE info. Columns GPL v3 compatible and OSI approved are already included in Comparison of free software licenses. Mattg82 (talk) 22:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if only because there should not be articles on the attributes of topics. How is that different from an article on just the topic? Any useful info here should be included in Free software license or Comparison of free software licenses. Steve Dufour (talk) 22:46, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at the very least, the external links need cleaned up or converted to references. Them From Space 03:03, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Half of this is original research; I doubt proper citations can be provided for faux jargon terms such as "software brick" or "level of permissivity". The rest is exhaustively covered in other articles. Noym (talk) 18:33, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as content fork of Comparison of free software licenses. If there is any useful, sourced content in this article which doesn't already appear in the comparison article, a merge might be appropriate. —SW— ^talk 23:42, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.