Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantis Pattern
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Atlantis Pattern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This fictional topic does not establish notability independent of Transformers: Cybertron through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 23:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Simply trivial cruft from what I can see. Relevant information (if there is any) should be in the Cybertron article. RobJ1981 (talk) 02:51, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge a appropriate small part of this content along with the other minor weaponry and devices and plot elements. None of the arguments in the nomination are reasons for deletion instead of merging. Agreed, this was not the way to write encyclopedia articles, but some of the content is nonetheless mergable. That point seems to be ignored in this batch of nominations. DGG (talk) 06:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly no notability for an independent, encyclopedic treatment. Eusebeus (talk) 19:34, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.