Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assuria CyberSense
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MER-C 12:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Assuria CyberSense (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This software does not meet WP:GNG. This source in the article is essentially based entirely upon a press release, and this source does not appear to be reliable per Wikipedia's standards. The company PDF press release in the article also does not confer notability. The Softpedia article provides some information and is bylined, but source searches are providing no additional significant coverage in reliable sources. North America1000 00:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - there's been a pile of bad articles on Assuria products created and deleted lately, we may have to start salting as well - David Gerard (talk) 04:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assuria Log Manager - David Gerard (talk) 21:41, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete & salt -- an unremarkable software package and a WP:PROMO article, with "product brochure" content and nothing else. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. More corpspam; absolutely no notability. FalconK (talk) 05:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.