Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asset Point

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- Y not? 15:32, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asset Point

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 22:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the article is unintelligible, the references in the article don't help to establish notability, and I see nothing usable on the web. Google News links only a press release, Books and Scholar know nothing about it. Instead WP:B2B seems to be written under the impression of this article. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 11:59, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: yet another purveyor of unnotable "solutions". . . Mean as custard (talk) 15:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: global IT Software and Services company that provides a solution for managing physical capacity in facilities, modeling IT Changes and managing processes for IT transformation from the data center to the desktop. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom, and especially per Smerdis above. --Tgeairn (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't see how this might meet our notability guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:08, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.