Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArtFund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:32, 22 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArtFund

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod was removed. So to AfD we go. Original delete reason provided by @Huon:. Reposted as I fully agree with it.

Effectively a duplicate of Alturaash Art; no indication of notability. All three external links and references are copies of the same newswire; apparently no detailed media coverage exists beyond that one article. That's not enough to meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Majora (talk) 23:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 23:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the article has not been improved since I proposed it for deletion, and I stand by the PROD comment. Huon (talk) 23:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No indication of notability. Maproom (talk) 07:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Huon and WP:GNG.ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 12:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I would've PRODed as there's simply nothing convincing here at all, by far nothing to suggest this would have the solidity especially with it only existing for 5 years. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My search didn't turn up any coverage of "Alturaash Art Fund" in the media, aside from the July 2014 press release. This seems to be a loans service offered by the Alturaash Art company which fails to be notable when judged against WP:PRODUCT. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:11, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Sources do not support notability. Also, this is not the only place that loans to artists based on their work. Annie Liebovitz quite famously sold her copyrights for financing, as did David Bowie.HappyValleyEditor (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.