Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arignar Anna Institute of Science and Technology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JohnCD (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arignar Anna Institute of Science and Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Verified Institute. Pure advertisment Pdykkh007 (talk) 12:40, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:N. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 16:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Change vote to Keep per explanations given by User:Necrothesp. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 19:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, perhaps this is not Oxford University, but an institution accredited by the All India Council for Technical Education would per se be notable enough to warrant an article. I removed some promotional wordings. --Soman (talk) 08:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, Annamalai University has winded-up the relation with this institute. The page gives the relation only for 2011-2012 which ended up in May 2012 itself. As per the records of Anna University, the institute has only 17 acres of land and 32,000 Sq. Ft. of constructed area. An institution accredited by the All India Council for Technical Education is not eligible for being as an article as Wikipedia nowhere states that the accredited institute can be as a part of this mega encyclopedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdykkh007 (talk • contribs) 12:14, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to be a verified, accredited tertiary institution, which is sufficient for inclusion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:50, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There is no sufficient proof for tertiary institution! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdykkh007 (talk • contribs) 03:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Er, yes there is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Academic year 2012 is concluded by May. There is no extension granted. Pdykkh007 (talk) 18:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikipedia, once notable, always notable. This is an encyclopaedia, not an almanac of current events. We have many articles on institutions which no longer exist, let alone those which still exist but which may or may not still have a specific status. Not sure why you're so keen to get this article deleted. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep; as per Soman. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 19:57, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.