Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argus Monitor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Computer fan control#Software. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 03:04, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Argus Monitor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 2013 no-consensus. The same concerns of a lack of editorial coverage remain with this being possibly the best source, and nothing but a list of features. GHits are conflated by download links, but there's no significant, in-depth coverage of this product. StarM 17:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. StarM 17:10, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prior AfD is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArgusMonitor StarM 11:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Computer_fan_control#Software, where it is mentioned. In addition to the source given by the nom, Softpedia also contains a short review. Together these two sources are enough for basic verifiability and a short description of the program, but do no rise to the level of GNG notability. The program is already briefly described in context in the section Computer_fan_control#Software, and that seems a reasonable due weight target given the sources. --{{u|Mark viking}} {Talk} 00:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:34, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see anything notable here. I neither support nor oppose the suggested redirect. Jeepday (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.