Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argo Navis (computer)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 08:19, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Argo Navis (computer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources. I did find a review but this doesn't appear to be a professionally published review, nor is 1 review sufficient to prove notability. James086Talk 19:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:25, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not appear to be WP:NOTABLE. I couldn't find any reliable sources that mentioned it. The little green pig (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:33, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:PRODUCT. The maker, Wildcard Innovations, may be notable, but this product doesn't seem to be: I couldn't find any references to it via online reliable sources. -- Trevj (talk) 12:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.