Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqualung (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 09:01, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Aqualung (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Aqualung (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. No significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. No sigcov – there's really not much more to say. ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 01:42, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Delete could not find anything Rlink2 (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

• Comment – Here's a source providing relatively significant coverage from Opensource.com, which is published by Red Hat:

• "3 open source music players: Aqualung, Lollypop, and GogglesMM".

– Adding a refined search parameter below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:54, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

• (Find sources for "Aqualung Linux": Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.