Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apriso (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Max Semenik (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apriso

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted through AfD just over a year ago for failing WP:CORP. From what I can tell nothing has changed - the references provided are either primary sources from the company, or passing mentions in articles about other companies - no significant coverage in other words. SmartSE (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. That's quite a collection of press releases from the PR noise machine you got there. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:44, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt still not notable. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 21:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but don't salt. It got recreated once 8 months after it was first deleted. That is not a persistent vandalism issue that needs to be solved with salt. We have WP:CSD#G4 for reposts. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:09, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.