Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| spout _ 17:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Appium (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find reliable sources to support notability Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some sources that may support notability: [A blog post from a company that hosts Appium as a cloud service] [News coverage mentioning another company hosting Appium as a cloud service] [A presentation featuring Appium at PyCon] [Another blog post about Appium (not by an Appium creator)] [A presentation on Appium (also not by an Appium creator)] Sahazel (talk) 18:52, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable software article with no RS references - blogs and presentations do not establish notability, and 'cloud-computing-today.com' is a blog, not 'news coverage'; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[Same story in Dr. Dobbs], in case that counts as an RS reference. 70.36.236.168 (talk) 23:13, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I think this is just too new. I like the idea, but it needs to establish a bit more. Once that's done, we can bring this back, yesno? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.