Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppHarbor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. L Faraone 02:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AppHarbor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphan, notability Notnoteworthy (talk) 07:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 09:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No real info, probably WP:SOAP. Grande (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:52, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 16:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article on startup with insufficient coverage to establish notability. Sources have only incidental mentions, or are product release/PR notices. Y-combinator's article shows they have funded 500+ startups; such funding does not in itself establish notability Dialectric (talk) 10:23, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.