Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollarium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apollarium

I doubt this exists - I can find on Google an exact replica of this page, in Webster's dictionary. But which came first? Jackclubs (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - ~~but move first to Wikitionary where it belongs, so tagged. The term does exist as shown here [1]~~. Thanks. ShoesssS ^Talk 12:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. That damn Webster's dictionary (Webster’s Quotations, Facts and Phrases) is more trouble than it's worth. Notice that the definition ends with "(WP)", which means that it's a direct copy of the Wikipedia article. Fooled me the first time I tried to cite it as an independent source, too. Deor (talk) 13:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No non-WP-based hits on Google Web, Books, or Scholar; unless someone can come up with a valid paper source, this fails WP:V. The word has already been deleted recently on Wiktionary, so I don't think transwikiing is the way to go here. Deor (talk) 13:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 15:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 15:56, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No evidence that the term exists. And it wouldn't work in practice, in any case - the glass part of the roof would have to be moved up and down throughout the year, unless the building was on the equator. Tevildo (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. It's not in the two Dover architectural dictionaries I have (Sturgis, Harris). —Tamfang (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.