Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Lamenessing Engine (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seicer | talk | contribs 14:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Anti-Lamenessing Engine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No claim to notability, and no notability is apparent. No media coverage and only 980 ghits. A previous discussion, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Lamenessing Engine, resulted in no consensus, but the arguments made there ("it's used in Linux distributions") are unpersuasive. Sandstein 04:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn samj (talk) 07:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep "other things exist" ;) --Gmaxwell (talk) 17:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 20:46, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:38, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A Google Scholar search turned up at least one source that appears reliable: [1]. *** Crotalus *** 03:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Mention in that paper above is literally a 1 liner. The nomination is persuasive. Protonk (talk) 05:52, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete due to lack of non-trivial mentions in reliable sources. Stifle (talk) 08:33, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete why is "written by David Hilvert" mentioned, he is not notable, is there an element of self promotion. Also pre Stifle. Darrenhusted (talk) 09:47, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Stifle. The source quoted in the PDF paper is basically half a sentence and a footnote linking to the website. Also WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason to keep a page. Bettia (rawr CRUSH!) 11:05, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.