Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antahpragnya

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Not a strong deletion rationale and support for Keeping this article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:21, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Antahpragnya

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Flagged as AI-generated by Editor113u47132, unclear notability. -- Beland (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Technology and India. Beland (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The sole source is a BusinessWire press release. Other sources that I turn up are the same or other press releases, republished elsewhere, and RGUKT's own publications. Uncle G (talk) 01:20, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I ran the article through ZeroGPT and it returned a result of 80.67% human-written. While it definitely needs cleanup and still has to demonstrate notability, I don’t think there’s sufficient reason to label it as AI-generated. I’ve gone ahead and removed the AI-generated tag. HerBauhaus (talk) 06:40, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article now includes broad, independently sourced coverage of the 2020 Antahpragnya event from The Hindu and The New Indian Express (both WP:RS), along with regional coverage from The Hans India (WP:V). This satisfies WP:GNG for Antahpragnya 2020. Given that coverage is currently limited to this single event, narrowing the scope to "Antahpragnya 2020" would be more appropriate. HerBauhaus (talk) 10:47, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Telangana-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:19, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per new sources above which should suffice for RS, V. I briefly copy-edited the lead which ought to improve its standing. ‒overthrows 19:53, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.