Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Answerbag (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:08, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answerbag

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable website. Whiterasner (talk) 13:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:54, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Cnet and TechCrunch articles cited, among others, give very substantial coverage. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:57, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:NWEB and significant RS coverage not found. I was unable to find the Cnet coverage. TechCrunch indiscriminately covers anyone; this source is not suitable for notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- No significant coverage by third party sources. I was able to find a lot of mentions in articles about other things, which is not enough to meet notability criteria. Cait.123 (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- Basically per Cait.123, I tried and can't seem to find any coverage from third party sources. All of the Cnet sources from the last AFD are gone as well, --Church ^Talk 01:29, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.