Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anonymous Bodies in an Empty Room

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 14:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous Bodies in an Empty Room

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to establish this as Wikipedia-notable outside of an Allmusic article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 05:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Swans discography. Can't find enough coverage to be notable, and live albums typically don't get the same attention as studio albums. Also, the article is very short, so preserving the information isn't much of an issue. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:17, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep AllMusic should meet WP:GNG. At worst, redirect to Swans discography. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has secondary sources, live performance albums are still notable.--Soul Crusher (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GNG requires "reliable sources" - "Multiple sources are generally expected" - but AllMusic is only a single source, and therefore doesn't establish notability. Read WP:RS for more information. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And yet a new BLP article only requires one reliable source. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 19:25, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLPPROD isn't a notability policy. An individual can pass BLPPROD but still fail notability policies: "This method of proposed deletion is an additional tool to be used in the interests of increasing the quality of BLP sourcing on Wikipedia. Nothing in this policy should be understood to affect the core content policies or existing deletion processes." (from WP:BLPPROD) --Colapeninsula (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 02:17, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:04, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, official release from a notable band, and some third-party coverage. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.