Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annapolis Micro Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (note the relist just preceding this was a finger slip on my part.) joe decker ^talk 02:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Annapolis Micro Systems

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:CORP. Highly promotional, lack of independent coverage. References are all press releases, directory listings, interviews with CEO, etc. MB (talk) 23:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, fails WP:CORP, with no significant coverage online from WP:RS. Speedy deleted as spam a few days ago. OnionRing (talk) 23:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and I would've frankly PRODed but we may need G4 later considering the closely tied restarts, nothing at all convincing for any actual notability. SwisterTwister talk 19:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Corporate PR. No independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 02:07, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.