Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angolan Brazilian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Angolan Brazilian

40,000 of 190,000,000 people in Brazil - insignificant. Punkmorten (talk) 13:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Yet another article from a sentence in a Brazilian government document. I'm kind of surprised that there are so few (relatively) people from Angola in Brazil, since both places were former colonies of Portugal. A good article might be made, since slaves were brought from Portugal's African colonies to Brazil Afro-Brazilian #Origins, but this is one of a series of ______ian Brazilian stubs being created to take up space. Mandsford (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep For Real - This is interesting, someone should add information about angolans in brazil. Angola was once a former colony of Portugal at one time, so i think it's good to add some source to this article.Cup22 (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Keep Keep - Brazil has received a small number of immigrants from Angola over the past decade. Give this article some time to build up information.Unknown789 (talk) 06:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone who is interested is welcome to add sources or to build up information, but it isn't going to happen on its own. Mandsford (talk) 14:30, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect and merge into Afro-Brazilian.--Thomas.macmillan (talk) 01:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless evidence can be found that suggests that this intersection is notable. The former colonial links might throw up some evidence, but unless it is found, there's no assertion of notability. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Valid stub. The article needs improving, not deletion. --Troy86-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 10:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect - It need either improvements or redirect it to a certain page regarding or related to foreigners in Brazil. Blackable2323 - 10:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Based on trivial primary source. Not Notable. Descíclope (talk) 00:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. It is hard to trace the roots of Afro-Brazilians b/c of slavery, so I doubt they are talking about them. Angolan Brazilians probably means Angolans who settled in Brazil around the 20th and 21st century. They're are not notable b/c Angolan Brazilians have not influenced Brazilians society. Lehoiberri (talk) 02:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One more unecessary something-Brazilian article created by Skanter, or Skanter2 or whatever this person is. By the way, this user has several different accounts and also used many sockpuppets. Many people already told him to stop creating articles about there minor ethnic groups of Brazil, but he just does not pay attention to us. He recently created the Cubans in Brazil article, claiming there are 700 Cubans in Brazil! Why do they deserve an article? This is insane. Opinoso (talk) 19:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.