Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelo Zawaydeh
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 13:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Angelo Zawaydeh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability of the subject nor the significance of his death within the context of the war is neither explained in article nor in attributed sources. Seems to be treading into memorial page territory. I acknowledge the criteria stated in WP:ANYBIO about award recipients; just throwing that out there for discussion about whether or not it establishes enough notability in this particular case. SoSaysChappy (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable memorial piece. Condolences to his family. Carrite (talk) 17:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, memorial; notability not established. Condolences. Deiz talk 01:36, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Diego Grez (talk) 23:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet Wikipedia guidelines for notability. Edward321 (talk) 01:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep: Given the breadth and depth of coverage, it seems that he's caught some moderate media attention beyond that of the typical death in Iraq. A number of varied sources make me think this is more than just the typical local obit. I'm not sure it's lasting coverage, however. bahamut0013wordsdeeds 14:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.