Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andreas Eppink
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 22:04, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Andreas Eppink (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sourced almost entirely to his CV or own work and fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and salt. Unambiguous WP:PROMO, previously BLPPRODed but recreated by the same SPA, blanked and recreated after AfC submission was rejected for copyvio, article creator continues to add copyvio text to the article despite being reverted multiple times. It is a waste of editor and administrator time. Bakazaka (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:10, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NBIO. No coverage in independent reliable sources. Sources are all self-published. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
- Delete too much promotion here. Qualitist (talk) 09:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.