Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andhra Box Office

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:26, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andhra Box Office

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see any evidence that this is a notable website. The only references I can find to it (excluding the alexa-type websites that just analyze the site on its own) is the fact that the IBT newspaper uses it as a reference. I think it says more about whether the IBT is a reliable source when it's doing things like posting box office results based on comparing tweets of Andhra Box office and some twitter post called "Tolly BoxOffice (of which I can't even find a website). As such, I don't find evidence of substantial coverage on independent reliable sources. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It maybe possible that the references are in regional i.e local languages, see WP:INDAFD.— CutestPenguin^Hangout 10:57, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no reason why we should speculate as to that. The website is entirely in English. It's used extensively for English-language articles here. I think we should presume that the lack of sources indicate the lack of sources rather than presume that there may exist sources in some other language for some reason. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:55, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This website has not got any reliability value. Daan0001 (talk) 07:03, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 11:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 13:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article fails WP:GNG. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:33, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Can't find any sources to show notability. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:43, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.