Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrullah Deep Liquidity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Amrullah Deep Liquidity

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be original research; there are precisely two Google results for "Amrullah Deep Liquidity", both from the same website. ... discospinster _talk 13:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:53, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Recent tradingview post and naught much else - fails GNG. Also fails WP:NOTADVERTISING - possibly even grounds for speedy. We're actually stating in our voice "The average 12-month percentage net profit of ADL backtested across BTCUSD is 1621% and the average 1-month percentage net profit of ADL backtested across BTCUSD is 135% during the periods between 2017 to 2019." - which is, well.... If it's doing so well, why not trade yourself with this? Icewhiz (talk) 13:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note I AfDed - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhd Amrullah as well.Icewhiz (talk) 14:07, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree 100% with the above. Nothing else to add. MaskedSinger (talk) 15:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.