Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Hashmi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Hashmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nothing to suggest this man passes WP:BIO or WP:MUSIC. While the winning of a state singing competition may be notable, it is not only unverified (and personally, I can't find any sources) but lacks any indication as to how prestigious the award actually is. Ironholds (talk) 22:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – A 10 day delete was proposed on 14 Feb on the grounds of no BLP references; since then no viable, or any, references have been proffered. This first delete template was removed by the article’s creator on 20 Feb, after adding a non-inline link to the subject’s own web site that had no evidence to back-up any claim. A swathe of copy-and-paste vio on 20 Feb, that appeared intended to aggrandize the subject by replacing his name into another’s text, obviously could not be referenced, and was removed. The article still gives the sound of importance but - at present - provides absolutely nothing to support its assertions. Emperor’s new clothes. Acabashi (talk) 02:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom: I couldn't find sources either. May become notable in the future if the "upcoming album" is released and attracts press attention. Melchoir (talk) 02:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete following a good analysis by Acabashi, et al. No apparent notability, just potential. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 16:13, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.