Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternative Airlines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:44, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Alternative Airlines

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Alternative Airlines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP, especially with respect to WP:CORPDEPTH. — Newslinger talk 03:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

• Analysis of sources:
  1. TTG Media: Coverage is not significant. The article focuses on payment systems (e.g. Amazon Pay), and gives very little information about Alternative Airlines itself.
  2. Companies House: Indiscriminate directory listing.
  3. Fast Track: Not significant. WP:CORP is stricter than WP:GNG, and doesn't give sourcing exemptions to companies that are on ranked lists.
  4. Yell: Indiscriminate directory listing.
  5. Travel Daily Media: Not significant. Reads like a press release.
  6. Fintech Finance: Blog. Not reliable or significant. Reads like a press release.
  7. Alternative Airlines: The company's website. Not independent.
  8. Alternative Airlines: Company press release. Not independent.
  9. Fintech Finance: Blog. Not reliable. Reads like a press release.
  10. Travel Daily News: Self-published blog with two authors. Not reliable.

I found no sources outside of the ones cited in the article that would support Alternative Airlines's notability. — Newslinger talk 03:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 03:29, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

• Delete - This is a common misconception when it comes to company pages in Wikipedia. Some people feel that a lot of press makes a company notable. In fact, its the quality of the press as defined by WP:ORGCRIT that really matters. For this company, ORGCRIT is not met with any of the sources analyzed above or for any sources I found in a Google search. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 09:00, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.