Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aleph Zadik Aleph

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aleph Zadik Aleph

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. The entire article is sourced to one history book of the BBYO organization, and two other primary sources are sprinkled in. WP:GNG is not assured at all. Yoninah (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 19:39, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:26, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The topic is encyclopedic and has an entry, for example, in the "New Jewish Encyclopedia". There is a lot of reliance on one source. There is a template for this problem. It isn't there. There is a lot of coverage so plenty to choose from. Altogether a legitimate WP:SPINOUT and good organization of information. I wish the girls article came anywhere close. Finally, how does this nomination meet WP:BEFORE? I'm not saying it doesn't but did not find the relevant history. gidonb (talk) 12:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Gidonb: I'm not sure what you mean. I did do a check for relevant sources before nominating this, and found none. Perhaps you could add the "New Jewish Encyclopedia" source to the page. Yoninah (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- See sources below. gidonb (talk) 12:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: just needs more sources. I didn't delve too deeply to find [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], which partially demonstrate how widespread the org is & recognized for their awards. = paul2520 (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.