Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alea GPU (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alea GPU

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here}

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 06:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging PamD, nominator of the first AfD, who withdrew the AfD and added some sources. There is a PR piece on an NVIDIA site; not a notability indication since it is written by the company, though, so delete. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 17:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete far too tiny of a niche to meet notability threshold. This and QuantAlea were created by single-purpose account Gpuwiz who only edited for four days. Too Soon. W Nowicki (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.