Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alchemy App
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Alchemy App (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declined Prod. Application does not appear to meet WP:GNG. A search revealed no substantial, third-party sources which would suggest otherwise. France3470 (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like an obvious failure of WP:GNG. Also, while not deletion arguments as such, appears to consist entirely of WP:OR, possibly with some marketing material mixed in, so it's not like what we have is particularly worth saving. 86.** IP (talk) 22:56, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Alchemy (game). There's no reason whatsoever for this to have an article to itself, but it's worth a brief mention in the game's main article itself.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:39, 24 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Upon looking at the article, there's already a brief mention of the app version in the intro, which is all that's really required.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
- Delete per the above. The app itself has no real notability to speak of - and, even if it did, a section as part of the article for the game itself would be preferable. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 18:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, notability not asserted by reliable third party sources. - Mailer Diablo 17:58, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.