Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agricultural output in Italy
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Economy of Italy#Agriculture. Sandstein 17:26, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agricultural output in Italy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pretty much pure WP:OR, based off one source (which is only used for the production numbers). Nothing in this article is worth merging into the main Italy article in any form. Plenty of unsubstantiated peacock terms as well. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 14:18, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Economy of Italy#Agriculture. An encyclopedic, properly sourced, article could be written on this topic, although Agriculture in Italy would be a preferable title as it would invite a broader treatment of the subject than merely presenting agricultural output statistics. So the subject matter does have some WP:POTENTIAL. I do agree with the nom though that little salvageable material is present in the article under review, and what could potentially be salvaged from the lead is already better stated over at Economy of Italy#Agriculture. So it seems to me that a redirect would be best for now, although I have no prejudice against the creation of a new article about Italian agriculture (or someone completely rewriting the existing article). --Mike Agricola (talk) 17:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:BITE? Seriously? This user has been around since May 2012, so I'm REALLY not sure why you're accusing me of violating that guideline... Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.