Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adware.W32.ExpDwnldr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adware.W32.ExpDwnldr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see anything that suggests this particular Trojan horse virus was notable, I don't think we need an article for every trojan virus ever created, only the ones receiving significant coverage in reliable sources. Many of the articles in Category:Trojan horses probably don't meet notability guidelines. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:32, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -War wizard90 (talk) 02:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Absolutely no coverage, much less significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. APerson (talk!) 03:56, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Completely non notable trojan. Safiel (talk) 02:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software (virus/trojan) article of unclear notability, lacking significant independent coverage. The brief description on the Panda antivirus site is on its own not sufficient to establish notability, and a search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 21:12, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.