Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure Time: Battle Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Adventure Time#Video games. (non-admin closure) feminist (talk) 14:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure Time: Battle Party

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cant find any sources about this TV show-based web browser game tie-in. Coin945 (talk) 10:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 12:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'd say redirect to Adventure Time, but the game is already shut down and nobody would likely care about this flash in the pan going forward._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep or alternatively Merge to Adventure Time#Video games - Naturally!!! It's a multimedia adaptation of a big franchise, it has sigcov in RSes (https://www.gamezone.com/reviews/review-adventure-time-battle-party-is-a-slamacow-experience-that-s-full-on-algebraic, https://www.destructoid.com/throw-an-adventure-time-battle-party-with-this-new-moba-275086.phtml, https://www.redbull.com/se-en/top-5-mobas-you-didn%E2%80%99t-know-existed); it might have enough coverage for a standalone article, but if not, it's definitely worth a mention in the franchise article. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 07:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per above comment. SeraphWiki (talk) 20:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per the above comment and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 00:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.