Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Content Analysis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Content Analysis

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After 6 years, this article consists of less than a dozen unsourced sentences. Sean Brunnock (talk) 13:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Sean Brunnock (talk) 13:20, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In fact, this is probably the most deletable article I've ever seen. Not only does it contain no useable text, but I'm far from sure the title is useful. Unless 'advanced' content analysis were documented as a distinct concept separate to mere 'content analysis', there's no need for this. Elemimele (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What content is there here that is any different from our better-developed article on Content analysis? I see no need for a redirect from a title that merely places "advanced" in front of it. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:05, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, in favour of the superior content analysis article. A redirect is not appropriate due to subject WP:PUFFERY. SailingInABathTub (talk) 00:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.