Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Rutter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Stronger arguments for keep despite fewer by number. —Ganesha811 (talk) 02:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Rutter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Fails to meet significant coverage criteria. Sources cited are just result lists and basic profile things. As the editor who added the "needs additional citations" notice said they are "garbage". I cannot find anything that would class as significant coverage to add. Shrug02 (talk) 11:33, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sport of athletics and Australia. Shrug02 (talk) 11:33, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Olympics. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No news coverage found of this person, other than confirmation of existence [1]. Sourcing in the article now is primary or directory listings. Oaktree b (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As per Oaktree b.Canary757 (talk) 17:35, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, WP:SIGCOV is met by new coverage including by The Age: [2] Rutter led the World Championships 20 km at more than half-way through the race and might have been the world champion had he not been controversially disqualified. He's (at least) mentioned in 28 other articles for The Age here but I haven't gone through them all: [3]. He was also interviewed by Dave Culbert for Fox Sports News here: [4] and covered for a TV programme at 3:18 here and 2:24 here. --Habst (talk) 17:24, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Well done Habst, I agree that achieves WP:SIGCOV. Just need someone to fix up the article now. Spinifex&Sand (talk) 21:52, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.