Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ActiveJDBC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:17, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ActiveJDBC

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find the type of substantial, in-depth coverage of this subject necessary to demonstrate notability. Searches turn up either brief mentions/name drops ([1], [2]), nothing at all ([3]), or unreliable sources ([4]). Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 21:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 14:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article lacks references. Searches turned up plenty of trivial mentions or how-to style stuff, but no in-depth coverage we could base an article on. - MrOllie (talk) 17:43, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Substandard sources, lacks factual depthDiamondchandelier (talk) 16:08, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.