Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Gamemaster (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Action Gamemaster

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Action Gamemaster
• Articles for deletion/Action Gamemaster (2nd nomination)

Action Gamemaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

NN vaporware. No reliable sources have ever been produced discussing this. I'd have redirected it to the company, but the outfit was an ephemeral one that had only one genuine release, ever, and I question whether it's a useful redirect term.

The "no consensus" verdict of the 2006 AfD was one of the many terrible outcomes common at AfD back then: a pure headcount which took such sentiments as "It might not be notable to you but it is to at least me," "This could be the perfect article. History like this should be recored [sic]," "I don't see why this cannot have its own article either" and the like as valid arguments to keep. Ravenswing 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Looking it up on the WP:VG/RS custom Google search engine, I get a total of five results, four of which are from the same website. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 17:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

• Delete. This is vaporware that is not notable. ZettaComposer (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.