Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AccessMyLibrary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:10, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AccessMyLibrary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed in 2015 by Piotrus and my own searches now have still found nothing convincingly substantial, there are mentions but still not at the levels of confident independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability. Softpedia coverage with download links is not independent and the piece is clearly regurgitated PR, and the Eastern Kentucky University ref is a how-to article/incidental mention, not significant coverage. A search turned up blog entries and more PR, but no significant WP:RS coverage. A redirect to Gale (publisher) could also be an option.Dialectric (talk) 15:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing GNG—my BEFORE found nothing I could cite, certainly nothing establishing significant, independent, reliable coverage—and the article does not otherwise merit retention. Rebb ing 06:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.