Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerator (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:28, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accelerator (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline G11 and possible G12, though I can't find the source, just mirrors. Survived PROD (solely courtesy heads up @James500: as Walter Görlitz is indeffed) so bringing it here. Sourcing does not seem to be enough to standalone article. It existed, and isn't easy to search for, but doesn't appear to be a notable piece of software Star Mississippi 02:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Star Mississippi 02:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree with the concerns raised above.--IndyNotes (talk) 15:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:04, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: for lack of notable sources. I tried the google "search before" since notability is not lost but I couldn't find anything. Rlink2 (talk) 13:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.