Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdullah Azam Khan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:26, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Azam Khan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person who hasn't achieved enough attention in WP:RS. Reliable sources are not used here to achieve the criteria in the page.

1. Times of India (RS)
2. Same article is again quoted
3. Non-RS (Myneta.info is just website which displays data of elected representatives)
4. India.com is not news organisation. Fails RS.
5. Reliable source but controversy in faking birth certificate.
6. Reliable source but stay on arrest of him.

In this case, the person fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG criteria who hasn't received any special coverage to have Wikipedia page. Already, Wiki community reached on the conclusion to delete this page and this page is again created as he won the election. But winning election doesn't guarantee person should have Wikipedia page as per WP:NPOL.

Hence, this debate. Harshil169 (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This person passes WP:NPOL. Mccapra (talk) 06:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Meets WP:NPOL "The following are presumed to be notable: Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or sub-national (e.g., province- or state-wide) office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels. This also applies to people who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them". He is an elected member of the legislature of a state of India. RebeccaGreen (talk) 09:02, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:NPOL. Note also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tazeen Fatma. --Muhandes (talk) 12:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NPOL as member of provincial legislature.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As a legislature of a state of India passes WP:NPOL. --SalmanZ (talk) 21:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per NPOL. ∯WBG^converse 13:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Article does need some improvement, but people who verifiably served as members of national legislatures pass WP:NPOL #1. Bearcat (talk) 15:04, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As above. --SalmanZ (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Satisfies WP:NPOL. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:NPOL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.