Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AV Multi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- AV Multi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It was suggested at MultiAV's discussion that this article also be deleted. It only has two references, one of which comes from the same site as MultiAV's references. Brian Jason Drake 06:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:34, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pretty much the same thing as Multi AV; I can't access the latter of the two, but both the sources look like little more than fansites. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 12:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – just as in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MultiAV, there is nothing reliable establishing how this port is notable. MuZemike 16:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete following my comment on MultiAV. Nothing notable at all about the specific connector. ~ Amory (user • talk • contribs) 18:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.