Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ABES Engineering College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 21:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ABES Engineering College

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relies on self published sources; a few paid refs found with a BEFORE. Does not satisfy NSCHOOLS. Looks like it is using Wikipedia to advertise itself. Vikram Vincent 06:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 06:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 06:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Educational colleges must take softly as per Wikipedia. Affiliated with a reputed University.Tictictoc (talk) 06:22, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Tictictoc, I noticed that you have !voted keep on a set of related AFDs. On what policy is your keep !vote based on? Vikram Vincent 06:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nom. And Tictictoc, there are no soft corner towards educational institution in case of notability. As per the notability criteria, A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This article clearly fails this. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 07:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources to indicate how any WP:NSCHOOLS notability criteria are met. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:20, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have cleaned up the page and yet it does not pass WP:HEY. Vikram Vincent 07:19, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution. We have always kept these by consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:53, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This editor is taking about some nonexistent consensus. Several AFDs they have !voted keep have been deleted. Unless they come up with proof to support their "consensus" their vote needs to be ignored. Vikram Vincent 10:02, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Necrothesp, I know you as a good-standing admin, but I'd like to ask for the consensus stating that "degree awarding institutions are generally notable". ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 17:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - TheAafi There was a time when pages on educational institutions without RS would survive AFD. However, consensus can change which is why there is even a tag called {{outcomes}}. I'd say a good argument would be to show WP:THREE sources that support WP:SIGCOV and I'll happily withdraw the nomination. Vikram Vincent 18:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.