Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A-fu Teng
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2012 May 4. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fails WP:MUSIC and general notability. Consensus is to delete (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:27, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A-fu Teng (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Youtube artist, hard to find sources, hard to tell if ref provided is reliable. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 17:06, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Although she seems more notable than other YouTube artists we get here (she seems to have risen to success beyond YouTube), I cannot find any sources beyond blogs and listings which do not given notability. However, there may be non-English sources that are harder to find; if any emerge I may reconsider. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 18:09, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced. Jarvis Sherbourne (talk) 18:56, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relist comment: I closed this as delete, but am relisting it following a comment on my talk page arguing that there are Chinese language sources. Sandstein 05:25, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 08:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The additions to the article made by the commenter to Sandstein's talk page evidence notability under WP:GNG, and, now having been able to search on the appropriate Chinese name, well, additional sources seem plentiful. [1], [2], etc. This Gnews archive search netted some meat by limiting the search to a specific album name, and several search results apply. --joe deckertalk to me 20:41, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.